Friday garden blogging

Progress


Sweet 100 cherry tomatoes added this week

Note that the volunteer broccoli seen in the picture is taking hold. The snap peas in the center of the photo are finally beginning to race. In the background, note the strength of the garlic bed.

Tonight I will actually have to put out the sprinkler after two very dry days (dewpoint 7°C, low 40s F). Tomorrow is supposed to be beastly hot, with 35°C (90s F) possible.

Maine craziness

Republican prevalence is all too common in what should be a blue state

Deep Blade Journal is more of a world events blog. But the insanity of the recent legislative session here in Maine forces me to write about it.

Even though Democrats control both houses of the legislature and the governor's office, Republican policy objections and allergy to taxes can carry the day. Usually, it is the Democrats that shoot themselves in the foot by proposing something complicated and insane that nobody can understand. This year, it was a $450 million ``revenue bonding'' package that included a sell off of future lottery revenues for cash this year.

The Republicans actually had a good point that, ``The worst thing we can do in these cash-short times is to borrow $447 million on a 16-year bond (without public approval), spend the money and suffer annual payments of $44 million for many years to come.''

Of course, the Republican idea was to play it for maximum political effect by starting a referendum drive for ``people's veto'' of the budget. Now, that's crazy, putting the budget out to referendum. But the strategy worked. The Democrats caved last week (Rs ended the signature drive), issuing a new budget with an across-the-board $125 million cut and a $1 add-on to the cigarette tax. Months of work on the budget were thrown out in seconds just to get somewhere they probably should have started with in the first place.

Tax reform?
In the midst of all this, state progressives in the form of something called Taxpayers for a Fair Budget (part of a coalition known as The Maine Citizen Leadership Fund) has developed a sweeping tax reform proposal. Here is the information given in this press release about what the plan would include:

• An expansion of the circuit breaker program, providing greater property tax reductions for those who need it most

• Fully funding the Homestead exemption, providing property tax reductions for all Maine residents

• Doubling the low income tax credit, and raises the personal exemption and standard deduction, providing income tax reductions for Maine’s low- and middle-income families

• Taking 50,000 low income families off the income tax rolls

But here is the kicker, not mentioned in the press release -- the plan would in the form of LD 1587, as reported by the Central Maine Morning Sentinal, ``reduce the top income tax rate from 8.5 percent to 8.25 percent''.

Hold on there! Tax cuts for the rich? What have Maine ``progressives'' become? Baby Bushies? At this point, I had an email exchange with a friend who has put a lot of good effort into movement building over the last few months, working to create a powerful progressive caucus in the Democratic party. I should not have been so contrary, I suppose, especially given that he has been right there all along in the tough game of politics, while I have not devoted the time recently...

Anyway, here are our exchanges on the tax theme, starting with my friend's initial email promoting the plan. Because the message said ``please pass this on'', I sent my reply to my Deep Blade Correspondents list. A bit lazy of me not to take out the non-Maine names, but some of you may I hope have found this interesting anyway:

Date: 17 Jun 2005 15:34 -0400 From: Scott Subject: Support tax reform bill from Taxation Committee

Scott Note: forwarded message attached. Please Pass This On!

Over the next 24 hours, the Maine State Legislature will vote on a historic tax reform bill which takes a bold step toward tax fairness in Maine.

This bill significantly lowers property taxes and income taxes for Mainers and is paid for by closing sales tax loopholes. This bill will put our tax system into balance for the first time in many years and will lead to long term stability for our state budget.

Call your State Representative at 1-800-423-2900 Call your State Senator at 1-800-423-6900 Call the Governor at 287-3531

Ask them to support the Taxation Committee's tax reform package, LD 1595!

A few calls can REALLY make a difference!

If you need help finding out who your legislators are, go to http://www.maine.gov/portal/government/edemocracy/lookup_officials.php

The Taxation Committee's reform bill includes:
...[same as listed above]...

The bottom line is, it provides broad-based income and property tax reductions for Maine residents- substantially for those who need it most- and it pays for this tax reform by eliminating sales tax loopholes that benefit mostly higher income residents and out-of-staters.

People have said with their voice and vote that they want the state to pay for tax reform responsibly, rejecting the false choice of either borrowing the money or damaging the safety net. This is a critical time in this debate and the opportunity exists to take a giant leap forward for tax fairness in Maine. We are asking you to call your legislators and the Governor to urge them to support the taxation committee's reform package because we need fair taxes now.

It is time to pass a responsible budget and real tax reform in Augusta. It appears we are at the moment of truth for both.

But legislators and the Governor need to hear from you!

Date: 18 Jun 2005 18:56 -0400 From: Eric Subject: support (now moot) tax reform bill from Taxation Committee?

Wait a sec, Scott. Is it true that this bill reduces the top income tax rate from 8.5 percent to 8.25? Personally, I do not support this package, despite some purportedly good things it does. Unless the tax cut for the rich is eliminated, or even changed so that a new, HIGHER, top rate is added for very-high-income people, I'm not going along. But decrease of the middle and bottom income rates, would be fine.

Top-rate income tax increase, NOT sales tax expansion, is the way to go to catch money from the wealthy. The sales tax provision included would cause all sorts of dissension across all income levels as services are taxed. Did you see the barber shop featured on Channel 2 News yesterday? They were downright ugly in there and were not about to think this thing through, not ever. That's the problem with these Democrat plans -- they hurt the wrong people in favor of sweetening the pot for the Republicans and the rich. The Democrats end up in a place where no one is listening to their arguments, even if some of them are good ones.

Property tax cuts should not be across the board either. Some formula for assessing coastal vacation palaces much, much higher property tax rates would be welcome. Let's get creative. Massive rates could be assessed in areas where such palaces are going up, while exempting the first 1/2 million dollars or so.

Now I see the whole thing is moot as the bill has gone back to committee. As for what they are going to do, I ask, do people really smoke enough to keep government afloat at a buck a pack?

Eric

Date: 18 Jun 2005 23:45 -0400 From: Scott Subject: support (now moot) tax reform bill from Taxation Committee?

Hey, Eric,

Thanks for your comments, essentially the same ones I made a couple of months ago to some of the progressive lobbyists when some of these things were first talked about. They said that, even with broadening the sales tax base, or raising the sales tax, and even with lowering the top rate (I guess deemed politically expedient to get the more enlightened parts, though they were not for it; our own bill would have raised it to 10%), lower income people would be better off, because the other provisions like increased earned income tax credit, percentage cap on property taxes, raising the income tax brackets, diminished cuts to services, etc., more than offset what would otherwise appear to be regressive tax policy. More comment interspersed below.

Wait a sec, Scott. Is it true that this bill reduces the top income tax rate from 8.5 percent to 8.25? Personally, I do not support this package, despite some purportedly good things it does. ... The Democrats end up in a place where no one is listening to their arguments, even if some of them are good ones.

I think this is an excellent point, and one that I have brought up with our lobbyists and coalition partners. (Taxpayers for a Fair Budget is the coalition, of which the Maine Progressive Caucus is a member.) Sometimes I'm not sure that everyone appreciates the "political" effect, such as you cite in your example above. Our experts say that Maine has one of the narrowist tax bases in the country. I beleive them, but that doesn't mean necessarily that we should follow everyone else.

I've been working with the Maine Citizen Leadership Fund people and Kit St. John from the Me Center for Economic Policy for the past year, and they really seem to know their business. I am always raising your kinds of questions, but they are able to point out the whole picture, and demonstrate how something that is on the face of it regressive can be subverted by other provisions of a bill, and actually come up with an overall positive result. And often it is just part of "selling" something to get the necessary support. Of course, the Gov and some of the Dem leadership have come up with some things that has us pulling their hair out.

Property tax cuts should not be across the board either. ... thing is moot as the bill has gone back to committee....

I would actually like to see a temporary penny sales tax increase called the "McKernan" tax, as long as the regressive effect would be offset by other preferential provisions for lower income people. And course, much of the budget cuts effect lower income people too. I think that would be more politically plausible across the parties, and also across classes than the cigarette tax increase. Right now the shortfall stands at 250m, which ironically is the amount that the state must commit to education, because of the 55% for ed referendum that passed last year, and supported by groups like the Me Municipal Assn, which of course is not being helpful to solve the budget problems. It seems a bit crazy to vote in something that doesn't say specifically how it will be paid for. The coalition's bill is L.D. 1587. Some of the highlights are in the press release, which can be seen at www.mainecitizen.org, specifically at http://mainecitizen.org/pressreleases/tax/tfb2005proposal.htm. If there is another coalition meeting in the next week or so, would you like to go with me? Thanks for you interest in this issue. I appreciate any further feedback you have. It is very helpful.

Scott

-----

There is some more email, but I won't include it here. All I will say is that I'm very uncomfortable signing up to support this because I'm told it has been wonked to be what is in the realm of the ``possible''. And they were not proud enough of the plan to specify the included tax cut for the rich. That seems crazy to me, as it seems to not even have existed anywhere, except in the realm of the wonks, until it just dropped into the news a week ago. No one has even tried to build support for progressive taxation, and recapture for the state of revenues Bush gave away to the rich. Partly, this is because Governor Baldacci has tried to out-Republican the Republicans on his no-tax pledge. This has been stupid. It's put the state in a box where a lot of little people are going to be hurt.

End the lies

End the loss of life in Bush's war


In an action today at the Margaret Chase Smith Federal Building in Bangor, Maine, names of the more than 1700 American dead in Iraq were read, along with one name of an Iraqi civilian killed for each of the American names. Perhaps only 1 in 50 of the total number of Iraqis killed could be read during the five-hour event. Parallel readings were conducted inside the office of Senator Susan Collins.


3500 looks like a lot of xs

Uzbekistan, Great Britain and the Ousting of Craig Murray

Paying the price for defending human rights

GUEST POST by Mike Walls
In light of new findings regarding the extent to which the US has aided and abetted the Karimov regime in Uzbekistan, I feel that a reprisal of the experiences of former British diplomat to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, is timely. Back in 2002 Murray exposed the human rights abuses going on in Uzbekistan and unwittingly revealed the Blair government’s support for such abuses.

Craig Murray’s story tells of a dedicated British diplomat who felt that by bringing to light human rights abuses on the part of the Karimov regime, his government would condemn them, sever diplomatic ties with Uzbekistan and take measures to prevent such abuses from continuing. To Murray's stunned dismay this was not to be. In a recent documentary here in Sweden entitled ``Agenda'', aired following the alleged massacres in Uzbekistan some weeks ago, Murray spoke out about his grisly experiences in Uzbekistan. On the question of torture he reports:

We received photos of a corpse, Mr Abazov, who had been boiled to death. The corpse, in addition to having its fingernails removed, showed complete scolding damage to the skin on the lower arms, legs and lower torso.

Murray made the claim that torture was systemic in Uzbekistan and that the information being procured from victims of this torture was being used by his own British government. Murray tried in vain to bring all of this to light to foreign secretary Jack Straw, as he explains:

When I first went back in November 2002 and said, ``look, America’s supporting this really vicious dictatorship here'', and the intelligence material we're gaining has been gained under torture, maybe I was naïve but I actually thought that if I brought this to Jack Straw’s attention, brought it up to a high enough level, then they'd stop.

Unfortunately for Mr Murray, he was being naïve, but his naïveté was a sign of his own human decency which contrasted greatly, as it transpired, to that of his superiors. On discovering his own government’s complicity, Murray, in the Financial Times in 2004, openly criticised MI6 and the CIA after publishing information in a Foreign Office document. This adherence to democratic principles did not bode him well, however. Murray was called home from Uzbekistan and an investigation was carried out, after which Murray was fired from his position as Ambassador. To this injury, much insult was hurled too:

So then they [the British Government] started contacting the Media, telling people I was an alcoholic, telling people I was offering visas in exchange for sex. They brought up these amazing allegations against me as formal charges which were then dropped.

According to the UN, there are currently up to 8000 people imprisoned in Uzbekistan for no more reason than their religious and political persuasions. Very few Uzbeks dare to speak out about Karimov’s crimes in Uzbekistan, but those who do have a chilling tale to tell. For example, peace activist, Surat Akrakov, told of beatings, rape and electric shock occurring as part of the torture regime.

Unwaveringly, Craig Murray, despite his ouster, travelled back to Uzbekistan in April 2003 in order to speak with one Professor Jamal Mersajdov, an outspoken critic of the Karimov regime. Unfortunately, Murray’s visit did not go unnoticed:

I left the house that evening, at 3 o’clock the next morning the body of his [Professor Jamal] grandson was dumped on the doorstep. The right hand had been immersed in boiling water or liquid for a long period. His murder was a warning to dissidents for meeting me or perhaps a warning to me for meeting dissidents.

The usual arguments from the Karimov regime were that torture is necessary in order to curb the threat of Islamic terrorism. However, dissidents and critics, alike, claim that this is merely used as a pretext in order to continue the repression and torture that is already emblematic of the Karimov regime; war on terror or no war on terror.

Craig Murray’s tenacity is to be commended in light of the many obstacles he has had to face. The sacrifices he and his compatriots in Uzbekistan have made to bring this story to light is worthy of praise too, since their sacrifices have shone the spotlight on the corrupt and despicable policies of the Bush and Blair governments since 9/11 and prior to 9/11.

Craig Murray, himself, has begun the slow journey back into politics. He has as his goal to displace the current foreign secretary, Jack Straw, for, like many of us, Murray understands the dire and dangerous consequences of a foreign policy which reneges on human rights laws and international law. To illustrate this point, Murray leaves us with a chilling reminder:

Torture breeds hatred, ill-treatment, repression, breeds hatred. That hatred is not just directed at karimov, but at the West who are seen as his close supporters. So really, we’re creating terrorism. In the future this is going to come back and hit us.

The last two sentences are a definitive mantra for our times, unfortunately. And it is one which resonates with layman and activists alike. It is encouraging that more and more people are becoming aware of the true meaning of power in relation to the US and UK. However, it is disconcerting that those, like Murray, who were once placed at power’s political epicentre are shunned and scorned when practising their duties of office, namely, to promote democracy and protect the rights of others at home and abroad. This once again reconfirms the truism that democracy in our beloved Occident is no more than rhetorical window dressing used in order to divert our attention from our leaders’ destructive Realpolitik. --Mike Walls

Collins needs clarity on war and torture

Vacuous senator from Maine thinks we want it ``blurry''


What is happening on one side of this image is abundantly clear.

Obsidian Wings had a piece back on June 15 that rattled me in my chair. The minimizations/trivializations of US torture practices various Republican & Fox News mouth breathers have been spewing forth have kept a pit in my stomach for a long time now. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rep. Duncan Hunter and his Gitmo meal plan, ..., ick, I am so sick inside.

So what is it that could stir me up beyond all that? The inane prattle from my US senator, Susan Collins of Maine, concerning what she thinks about her constituents' reaction to torture conducted in our name, that's what.

As Hilzoy points out, Collins is quoted in a ``somewhat frustrating'' June 12 New York Times Sunday Magazine piece by Joseph Lelyveld:

Members of Congress say they receive a negligible number of letters and calls about the revelations that keep coming. ``You asked whether they want it clear or want it blurry,'' Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, said to me about the reaction of her constituents to the torture allegations that alarm her. ''I think they want it blurry.''

I guess I should expect Collins to take us for foolish sheep following leader into the moral basement of responding to terror with terror, including blatantly illegal designation by American presidential fiat of a sub-human species called ``enemy combatant'' -- often located through paid bounty.

It's all so disgusting. So, let's do something to give Senator Collins some clarity! First, please read through and take all the steps recommended in the Obsidian Wings post linked above. Then, if you are in range on Thursday...

June 23 Anti-war demonstration in Bangor
Veterans for Peace and other local Maine groups have decided to protest at the Bangor offices of Senator Collins. The entire ugly ball of death and destruction due to the Iraq war is the target of this protest. The high crime of torture will be included in the list of impeachable high crimes of this administration. Here is the release from Maine Veterans for Peace:



An anti-war demonstration outside the Federal Building in Bangor is being called for June 23.

The demonstration, beginning at 10 a.m., will coincide with a visit by concerned citizens from around the state to Senator Collins’ Bangor office.

Both in front of the Federal Building and inside Collins’ office, people will read the names of the U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq since March, 2003, and an equal number of Iraqi civilians who have been killed. More than 1,700 U.S. soldiers have been killed and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

A statement to Senator Collins will request that she support:

* curtailing funding of the war
* a timetable for withdrawal, and
* a Congressional inquiry into impeachable offenses committed by the administration

The statement will also request that Senator Collins participate in a town meeting to listen to the concerns of her constituents. Rep. Tom Allen has already agreed to participating in a town meeting.

Gulf War Veteran and peace activist Kim Hawkins will participate in the demonstration joined by other members of Veterans of Peace and members of Peace Action Maine, Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space, Peace and Justice Center of Eastern Maine, Veterans for Peace, Peninsula Peace & Justice, Island Peace & Justice, and Midcoast Peace and Justice.

Bring your signs and puppets. Bring your friends. Help read the names of those killed in Iraq. The demonstration will last from 10 a.m. to 4 or 5 p.m. If you cannot participate the entire day, come for a few hours at any time throughout the day. The greater our numbers, the more impressive the public display of anti-war sentiment.

The Federal Building is located at 202 Harlow Street, Bangor.

Come demand the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan. See you there!

Info: Contact Dud Hendrick [dudhe at verizon dot net] or Judy & Peter Robbins [robbins at downeast dot net].

Note: Those planning to read the names inside Susan Collins’ office are asked to meet at the Peace and Justice Center of Eastern Maine at 9am, June 23.

Bonus garden blogging

Rose blossom ready to bloom


Looks to be a good year for our rose bush

This post makes up for Friday garden blogging missed on the 10th.

Extent of US aid to Uzbekistan revealed

New York Times: Uzbek Ministries in Crackdown Received U.S. Aid

Here is a key quote.

The United States has worked closely with Uzbekistan, a corrupt and autocratic state with a chilling human rights record, in the fight against international terrorism. It has also tried to professionalize the Uzbek military, improve its border security and help secure materials that could be used in nuclear, chemical or biological weapons - areas of engagement that American officials say are of clear national interest.

Note the naked admission that Uzbekistan violates the human rights of its citizens and possesses WMD materials. These were traits US officials attributed to Iraq before they invaded that country. However, in the case of Uzbekistan, it is in the US ``national interest'' to support this regime.

In that regard, the US has been involved in the training of Uzbek units known as ``Bars'' and ``Skorpion'', which evidently were involved in the May 13 massacre. But there is a cloak of ``uncertainty'' conveyed by the article due to parsing of who did, or did not receive US ``counterterrorism'' training. The truth emerges later in the article that a ``myriad'' of people and programs were involved, so in my opinion there is really no way to separate US involvement from the actions of the Uzbek personnel.

Furthermore, I note how the Times attributes only the noblest of intentions as the wagers the US military places in Uzbekistan form an ``implicit gamble in giving security help to a repressive state''. Perhaps the Times should investigate whether or not the repression really matters all that much to US strategists.

Downing Street research gem

Please see Behind the Downing Street Memos Lurks the specter of treason by Justin Raimondo at antiwar.com for an exhaustive set of links on the DSM.



I post this not only because Justin Raimondo has included in his piece a link back into Deep Blade Journal's March 29, 2005 post on Republican squelching of the Senate Select Committee's so-called ``Phase II'' Iraq intelligence investigation, but also because it's a damn fine resource for anyone wishing to learn the full context of the leaked Downing Street documents.

Friday garden blogging

Lupines


This hillside along US Rt 2 in Veazie is covered with Lupinus perennis.

Channel 2 (WLBZ) teased us tonight with a story that they were cutting down lupines in Acadia National Park. I can't find an internet reference. The explanation from a Park spokesman was that they feel lupines are invasive and crowd out native plants. There goes my romance with this venerable late-spring flower that dots roadsides everywhere around here this time of year.

Update: The Bangor Daily News has the Acadia story here.

Fear grips oil market

Bloomberg: ``Oil Rises Above $57 as Demand Growth May Outpace Production''

Here is how one analyst puts it in this story:

``There is no question that the market is going to $60,'' said Kyle Cooper, an analyst with Citigroup Inc. in Houston. ``There is a lot of fear and hype about the possibility of us running out of oil and it has stuck, attracting investment.''

An earlier Bloomberg story suggests that meeting summer gasoline demand in the thirsty US will be nip and tuck:

``This is the time of year when everyone is going to be freaking out,'' said Mark Waggoner, president of Excel Futures Inc. in Huntington Beach, California. ``It's going to take six weeks for any of OPEC's oil to actually get here and by then it will be the end of July.''

And it may be a long, cold, expensive winter in 2005-06:

World oil consumption peaks in the fourth quarter when refiners begin producing distillate heating fuels for the northern hemisphere winter.

``We're not in bad shape on crude and we're not in bad shape in terms of gasoline,'' Excel's Waggoner said. ``The distillate stocks are looking a bit low'', said Waggoner, who said oil will reach $60 by the end of next week.

Heating oil futures, a proxy for diesel and jet fuel, surged 19 percent the past month on concern rising trucking and aviation demand will strain refiners' ability to store heating fuel for winter.

Are you enjoying life at the point in history near the peak daily petrol production rate?

He's back

Reagan-era arms official David Emery emerges as Republican gubernatorial contender in Maine


Emery

An old nemesis is fixing to run for governor of Maine in 2006. David Emery was the opponent of Democrat Tom Andrews in the 1990 race for Maine's 1st District Congressional seat. It was a political race in which I became deeply involved on Tom's behalf. Tom won. He became one of the most progressive members ever to represent Maine in the US Congress.

Later, Tom lost to Olympia Snowe in the 1994 race to replace George Mitchell, who retired from the US Senate in 1995. He has had many distinguished positions since, including with the Win Without War coalition in 2003.


Image of button from the 1990 Andrews campaign.

Seeing Emery in public again, slithering out of his hole as a Republican opinion analyst, brings back a flood of memories of the Reagan years. Some of those memories appear in this letter I wrote, that was published in the now-defunct Maine Times (October 19, 1990):

A naysayer to peace

I feel the need to remind voters about the record of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA) during the tenure of Republican 1st District Congressional candidate David Emery as its deputy director.

Emery worked for ACDA from 1983 to 1988, under director Kenneth Adelman. Both were appointed by Ronald Reagan.

When Kenneth Adelman appeared, many of the agency’s diminished resources were used to wage a public relations campaign against arms control, particularly the 1972 anti-ballistic missile (ABM) treaty with the Soviet Union.

With much fanfare and media attention, they accused the Soviets of cheating.

The irony was hard to miss. The United States trotted out arms control chief Adelman to raise public anti-Soviet feelings by calling them liars and cheats while busily preparing to test a series of Star Wars missile defense schemes in violation of the treaty.

None of the allegations ever amounted to much, including the ballyhooed Krasnoyarsk radar. The Congress, with the support of senators George Mitchell and William Cohen and Rep. Joseph Brennan, stopped the Reagan administration from abrogating the ABM treaty.

So Emery now speaks of how he is “proud of the role that the Reagan and Bush administration have played” in the “greatest contribution to peace and stability on this planet that has happened this century.”

It is an odd kind of pride in arms control that allowed Emery to help with one of the most vicious attacks against it of the last decade. Emery unfairly takes way too much credit for the easing of tensions Which accompanied the INF treaty and subsequent collapse of key cold war battle lines.

Emery was always one of the nay-sayers to peace, a weapons advocate. Meanwhile, his opponent in the 1st District Congressional race, state Senator Tom Andrews of Portland, sponsored the Nuclear Weapons Freeze resolution in the state legislature, exposed the absurdity of ``crisis relocation planning'' for nuclear war and was an early supporter of the successful citizen-initiated referendum calling on the Navy to halt cruise missile testing in Maine.

Eric T. Olson
October 1990

Note the appearance Kenneth Adelman, Emery's old boss. Adelman, of course, became the Pentagon's most truculent pre-war promoter of the cakewalk theory of the Iraq occupation.

Uzbekistan massacre follow-up

US Administration sets limits on how much Central Asian people can yearn in the era of Bush-inspired democratic movements

Via Atrios, I see the Washington Post is reporting today that

Defense officials from Russia and the United States last week helped block a new demand for an international probe into the Uzbekistan government's shooting of hundreds of protesters last month, according to U.S. and diplomatic officials.

This is an utterly amazing news story. Here is another snip from it:

One official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to discuss the matter, said Rumsfeld caused great surprise by saying -- after being told in this discussion that the British language was consistent with stated U.S. policy and should be embraced -- that he was unaware of the policy, had not participated in meetings about it and did not want to press for its inclusion in the communique.

The communique nixed by Rumsfeld would have endorsed a ``independent, transparent'' international investigation into the Andijan massacre carried out by Uzbek forces one month ago. Evidently, the Pentagon has gone to war and prevailed over the State Department over US policy. Terror War basing in Uzbekistan has come out more important than human beings and their political rights.

How Myers kept the aid flowing last year
Here's yet another good one from the same story:

A senior State Department official, who called The Washington Post at the Defense Department's request, denied any "split of views." But other government officials depicted this week's spat over the communique as a continuation of frictions that erupted last summer, when then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell would not certify that Uzbekistan had met its human rights obligations. The decision led to a cutoff of $18 million for U.S. training for Uzbekistan's military forces.

Weeks later, Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, visited Tashkent, the Uzbek capital, and criticized that decision as "very shortsighted"; he also announced that the United States would give $21 million for another purpose -- bioterrorism defense.

Myers and Rumsfeld deserve to be brought up on charges for courting the criminal Karimov regime in contravention of all decency.

HRW lays it out
Meanwhile, a new report on Uzbekistan has been issued by Human Rights Watch. HRW's report ``details the Uzbek government’s indiscriminate use of lethal force against unarmed people, describes government efforts to silence witnesses, and places the events against the background of Uzbekistan’s worsening human rights record.''

PRESIDENT BUSH: ``All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.'' (January 20, 2005)

Cheney is lying about torture

Dick Cheney calls Gitmo torture a ``myth''. Deep Blade Journal responds with this guest post from Mike Walls. Thanks, Mike.

GUEST POST: Libyan Man from Sussex, England tortured at Guantánamo
I read in my local evening newspaper (The Evening Argus, Brighton, England) about a 35-year-old Libyan man who has been detained at Guantánamo Bay since 2002. Omar Deghayes has as yet not been charged with any crime, but in the Orwellian nether region of the Bush Administration where international law does not apply, where the Geneva Convention does not apply and where rules and regulations can be dispensed with, we are, to quote one David Rivkin, "releasing people because we're humanitarian, we're compassionate". For Omar Deghayes, however, this outpouring of "humantarianism", when in reference to its true correlate, namely torture, is described as follows in the Evening Argus, a Brighton newspaper:

The prisoner [Omar] complained of having a hose stuck up his nose until he was drowning, electric shock torture and being placed in a room painted with black and white stripes, containing a glass wall, behind which were snakes.

Mr Stafford Smith added his client had been told his wife would be
sold into prostitution when he was first taken into custody.

This is all further proof that Amnesty's usage of the term ``Gulag'' to describe the US prison archipelago across the Middle East and elsewhere, was correct. And even if the head of Amnesty may be accused of a degree of hyperbole, no doubt engendered by the horrors described by former Gitmo inmates, he can in no shape or form be accused of downright mendacity, the likes of which we have been exposed from Rivkin and his neocon coalition in recent years.

It is vitally important that more and more of these tragic accounts are reported, so that the body of evidence may one day overwhelm lackeys of the Bush war and mould public opinion and, who knows, shape future policy decisions. Fortunately for Omar, MP George Galloway’s Respect Party are to bring this issue up in Parliament at the next parliamentary meeting and pressure is being put on Brighton’s local New Labour MP to act quickly on this. Let us keep our fingers crossed for Omar and others like him in the hope that true humanitarianism may come their way.
--Mike Walls

Back from fantastic week

Deep Blade returns after an incredible week+ away at our local film and television school in Rockport, Maine. There is a lot to post, so let's get on with it...

Friday garden blogging

Summer days ahead: We broke 80°F today


Out-of-control vines in front of the house were cleaned out today. This should give the soil a chance to dry out.


Compost heap: All the vining stuff from the space shown in the first photo is on top on the left.


Snap peas are emerging. They are way behind last year's crop, which was standing about a half meter on this date.

Deep Blade Note
This is the last posting until perhaps Sunday June 12. I may be able to do Friday garden blogging one week from today, but probably not. I'll be at an intensive video camera workshop all next week. Please feel free to post Comments here on any topic you like. Until we meet again...

Headline: ``Permanent shortage of oil may loom''

This headline was over an AP release that graced page A6 of Tuesday's Bangor Daily News


Peak oil hits the mainstream: The wire-service story in the BDN included this AP graphic. Note that for the ``most probable'' scenario to take place, nearly half again as much oil will have to be pumping daily in 2026 than it is today. ``Least probable'' is doubling by 2047.

Either scenario seems ludicrous to me. The world petrol supply chain is severly stressed in maintaining the current rate of consumption, despite persistent high prices. And look at the fall-off to the right side of those peaks in the latter part of the 21st century! If any of these scenarios are even close to true, those years will be global hard times with no alternatives yet visible.

Beyond that, the article itself is quite good for the most part, giving the views of geologist Kenneth S. Deffeyes the respect they deserve. Deffeyes fixes world peak oil production in late 2005 or early 2006, more ``probable'' than the peak points shown in the graphic above, I believe.

On the other hand, peak oil skeptic Michael Lynch is quoted saying peak oil is silly. Evidently this is because the market is to control oil supply, not petroleum physics. Deffeyes is then quoted countering that, ``The economists all think that if you show up at the cashier's cage with enough currency, God will put more oil in the ground.''

Jonathan at Past Peak pulls out more of the important points here. Be sure to read the commenter who shrewdly notices use of the word ``could'' in the lead.

Meanwhile, Bloomberg is reporting Thursday: ``Oil traded near a six-week high in New York after surging 5.1 percent yesterday on concern refiners may fail to meet demand for gasoline and heating oil this year.''